Difference between revisions of "Cooperative Social Network"
From Internet Database
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative Cooperatives] are a viable economic alternative to less democratic forms of enterprise. While the Internet abounds in examples of cooperative endeavors, from wikis to open source software, economic cooperatives are rarely found in the field of high-tech. The cooperative form may seem poorly adapted to endeavors at the forefront of technological innovation - but how often has it actually been tried? | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative Cooperatives] are a viable economic alternative to less democratic forms of enterprise. While the Internet abounds in examples of cooperative endeavors, from wikis to open source software, economic cooperatives are rarely found in the field of high-tech. The cooperative form may seem poorly adapted to endeavors at the forefront of technological innovation - but how often has it actually been tried? | ||
| + | ==Structure of the coop== | ||
The idea would be to create a [[Cooperative Social Network]], similar to social networks such as Facebook or Friendfeed, but structured as a coop. The coop form could be developed on two levels: | The idea would be to create a [[Cooperative Social Network]], similar to social networks such as Facebook or Friendfeed, but structured as a coop. The coop form could be developed on two levels: | ||
*A [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative worker cooperative] for the team that develops and runs the website | *A [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative worker cooperative] for the team that develops and runs the website | ||
*A [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers%27_cooperative consumer's cooperative] for the users (voting membership would probably be limited to the paying premium members) | *A [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers%27_cooperative consumer's cooperative] for the users (voting membership would probably be limited to the paying premium members) | ||
| + | ==Business model== | ||
This cooperative social network could use the same business model as existing social networks: free accounts for the majority of users, paying accounts for premium users, and operating revenues from advertising and data mining. | This cooperative social network could use the same business model as existing social networks: free accounts for the majority of users, paying accounts for premium users, and operating revenues from advertising and data mining. | ||
As a cooperative, such a company would be less pressured by commercial constraints than those out to make it rich. It could serve more as a place for participative technical experimentation and for empowerment of its members. Also it could remain relatively small, the quality of its early-adopter membership making up for the improbability of mainstream adoption. | As a cooperative, such a company would be less pressured by commercial constraints than those out to make it rich. It could serve more as a place for participative technical experimentation and for empowerment of its members. Also it could remain relatively small, the quality of its early-adopter membership making up for the improbability of mainstream adoption. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Connected services== | ||
| + | In addition to providing social networking, the coop could offer to its members various additional services, such as: | ||
| + | *Online identity | ||
| + | *Bookmarking | ||
| + | *URL shortening | ||
| + | *Blog hosting | ||
| + | *Cloud services | ||
| + | |||
| + | Providers of the above-listed services, particularly when they are free, profit from mining the data that they thus obtain about the users' habits and preferences. When such activities are organized as a coop, the members themselves as a group can control and/or benefit from such data mining. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
