Difference between revisions of "Convivial Tools"
From Internet Database
(→Idea systems and social systems as "tools") |
(→Idea systems and social systems as "tools") |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
First steps for this project could be to identify the best available existing products (via a consumer reports type of website), or to have a pilot machine manufactured by a sub-contractor to "convivial" specifications. A second step might be to create a cooperative around this theme (as for example with the [[Cooperative Social Network]]). | First steps for this project could be to identify the best available existing products (via a consumer reports type of website), or to have a pilot machine manufactured by a sub-contractor to "convivial" specifications. A second step might be to create a cooperative around this theme (as for example with the [[Cooperative Social Network]]). | ||
− | == | + | ==Convivial systems: idea systems and social systems as "tools"== |
More broadly, I would like to explore the extent to which [http://conviviality.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=20 idea systems] and [http://conviviality.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=21 social systems] can be considered "tools," and how they could be made more "convivial" in Illich's sense. This vision can be set out in terms of a theory and practice of [[Convivial Systems]]. A recent example of the type of approach envisaged is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_2.0 Government 2.0] movement. | More broadly, I would like to explore the extent to which [http://conviviality.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=20 idea systems] and [http://conviviality.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=21 social systems] can be considered "tools," and how they could be made more "convivial" in Illich's sense. This vision can be set out in terms of a theory and practice of [[Convivial Systems]]. A recent example of the type of approach envisaged is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_2.0 Government 2.0] movement. | ||